spicylady303

Updated Apr 20

9 men's ties

Name: 9 men's ties
Brand: Lilly Pulitzer
SKU: 59b335a86d64bcd79504cd4c
Price: 215.0 USD
Availability: OutOfStock

Lilly Pulitzer

$215 $500

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $53.75 with . Learn More .

Size

Not for sale

Like and save for later

Hs

Category

Men

Accessories

Ties

Shipping/Discount

Seller Discount: 15% off 3+ Bundle
$7.97 Expedited (1-3 day) Shipping on all orders

aaronrichard181 and 15 others like this

13 Comments

millgirl274 will you sell these separately? Interested in the 2 on the right.

Sep 09Reply

spicylady303 @millgirl274 hey! So I took the pictures with my phone, but my keyboard is all messed up on my phone it would take way too long to write the info. Give me about ten minutes so I can get all the details on these typed up =)

Sep 09Reply

spicylady303 @millgirl274 yes of course

Sep 09Reply

wildsidebtq @spicylady303 how much individually? Or do prices vary?

Sep 20Reply

spicylady303 @timtatefashion they vary. Which ones were you interested in? 😊

Sep 20Reply

wildsidebtq @spicylady303 I'm interested in the striped one in the middle and the pink dragon one!

Sep 20Reply

spicylady303 @timtatefashion the dragon is a Lilly Pulitzer so its a bit expensive. But since I haven't had a chance to get these pressed at the cleaners, I'll throw the striped one in for free with the Lilly tie at 65. How does that sound?

Sep 20Reply

spicylady303 @timtatefashion i just scoped your closet, you have great stuff!

Sep 20Reply

wildsidebtq @spicylady303 so the striped isn't Lilly?

Sep 20Reply

spicylady303 @timtatefashion no, just the last two on the right

Sep 20Reply

spicylady303 @mattgar10 hey! I'm so sorry I didn't see your offer until just now! I need to update this listing as I believe 2 or 3 of these have sold, so we can definitely negotiate on the price if you're still interested. Let me know 😊

Apr 27Reply

peterdouglas Many ties appear creased - will you restore to roper increased condition before shipping?

Nov 26Reply

peterdouglas Should have been “... restore to proper uncreased condition...”

Dec 11Reply