rodbaker926

Updated Dec 02

All Saints Vintage Suede Black Blazer Style Coat size Medium

Name: All Saints Vintage Suede Black Blazer Style Coat size Medium
Brand: All Saints
SKU: 6359a488c5df6cba4e8e703d
Price: 250.0 USD
Availability: InStock

All Saints

$250 $695

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $62.50 with . Learn More .

Size

Like and save for later

Add To Bundle

Excellent condition, with will double collar that gives it a little more of an edgy look. Classic AllSaints coat. They still sell this style.

Category

Color

Style Tags

Shipping/Discount

$7.97 Expedited (1-3 day) Shipping on all orders

brettensor and 36 others like this

20 Comments

ogunbond220 pls post more pictures clear pictures

Oct 27Reply

rodbaker926 @ogunbond220 just did

Dec 02Reply

diazomike Are you selling bye jacket in the top photo, or the bottom two? Or are these three photos of the same jacket? If so, why do they look so different. It says men’s medium, but is modeled on a female mannequin. Is it a men’s medium, or a female jacket that fits like a men’s medium, please show a photo of the interior actual label of the garment to confirm size? Please upload photo of measuring tape of sleeve to shoulder, and chest width and shoulder to bottom hem for measurements.

Feb 14Reply

diazomike ^I ask because I’m interested.

Feb 14Reply

diazomike @rodbaker926 hello?

Feb 19Reply

rodbaker926 @diazomike It’s a Men’s medium. It’s not on a Women’s mannequin. It’s the same jacket on just different lighting.

Feb 20Reply

diazomike @rodbaker926 thank you fort he response, so does it look more like the top photo or the bottom 2, I’m unsure if I’m seeing wear or fade in the top or if it’s a bolder black like the bottom photo? And what year is this jacket? If you happen to know?

Feb 20Reply

rodbaker926 @diazomike it’s just faded that way originally. Looks not like the two bottom photos. This is a staple piece they still have in their stores as well as some department stores for the original price I bought it for. It is brand new.

Feb 20Reply

rodbaker926 Looks MORE like the two bottom photos.

Feb 20Reply

diazomike @rodbaker926 appreciate the info, Brand new would have tags. Also, looking closer upon the image; there appears to be 5-7 white stains on upper left label, So for clarity, can you provide a few new clearer pictures with consistent lighting. Just for clarity sake?

Mar 11Reply

rodbaker926 @diazomike I’ll pass! Have a nice day critic

Mar 11Reply

diazomike @rodbaker926 “Have a nice day critic?” You’ll “pass “on selling your garment to an interested party who’s asking to have a closer/better look at the garment by requesting better photos to verify the authenticity of your claim that “it is brand new” because it has no tags indicating it’s new? Hm?

Mar 16Reply

diazomike @rodbaker926 Should people not ask questions on a used clothing app? It’s has nothing to do with being a critical much as being observant-it’s a jacket not an ego-as well as validating your claims of quality before someone makes an informed purchases from you.

Mar 16Reply

diazomike @rodbaker926 I didn’t call you suspect, I ask for a closer photo with a clearer picture, and it looks like there is a white stain or discoloration, on the upper chest, so a new picture would be appreciated, however if your uninterested in fulfilling a potential buyers request or don’t want show the garment too closely, then I suppose that’s your choice.

Mar 16Reply

diazomike @rodbaker926 Although, admittedly, it’s hard to trust why you wouldn’t simply add a better photo to an interested buyer, instead of feigning indignation, don’t you think? Anyway, if your interested in actually selling your used garment in earnest, then feel free to post a better photo, And perhaps we can actually return to the business transaction this should be. Better photo or better price, to account for the risk. Simple as that.

Mar 16Reply

junkyarddog44 Hi, could you please provide the armpit to armpit (across the chest) measurements in inches of the blazer laying flat and buttoned up/closed? Thanks

Jul 21Reply