jill_sb

Updated Dec 28

Authentic Vintage Emilio Pucci Silk Blouse

Name: Authentic Vintage Emilio Pucci Silk Blouse
Brand: Emilio Pucci
SKU: 5550cf77729a660fdc00b7d8
Price: 106.0 USD
Availability: OutOfStock

Emilio Pucci

$106 $1,000

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $26.50 with . Learn More .

Size

Not for sale

Like and save for later

SOLD True couture. Collectors piece. Silk chiffon. Kimono sleeves. Elasticized waist. Made in Florence, Italy for Saks Fifth Avenue. In great condition. Please note this is a vintage size 8.

Category

Women

Tops

Blouses

Shipping/Discount

$7.97 Expedited (1-3 day) Shipping on all orders

cr7tx and 29 others like this

10 Comments

timelessluxchic @jlj007 would you consider a trade?

May 04Reply

summersverb So, does it fit more like a 6?

May 19Reply

jill_sb @summersverb - because of the open style, it would probably fit most sizes. Let me know if that helps :)

May 19Reply

sconley1123 Gorgeous!

May 31Reply

paygethepirate 😍😍😍

Aug 21Reply

eklectikvintage 😍😍

Sep 01Reply

jill_sb Sold this on eBay

Sep 30Reply

unportmanteau @jill_sb you bet. Got too many lowball offers and after the interaction with you (in which you said you weren’t interested after all that exchange) I decided I’m not keen to sell since they fit me. Mind your own business, please.

Jan 23Reply

jill_sb @alexandra_leila - wow- I’m so sorry you feel that way. It wasn’t personal at all. In my professional opinion, they would be worth the price it the original hem was still in tact, which is why I was asking questions before I put an offer in. And also why I was asking if there were any tags inside. I pay hundreds and sometimes even thousands of dollars for vintage denim so I need to know exactly what I’m buying.

Jan 23Reply

jill_sb @alexandra_leila So far, everyone has been very delightful to work with. No need to be rude here. And I agree that you should keep them. They look great on you and they haven’t produced this exact style (with selvedge) since 1984. So they’re rare and they look great on you!

Jan 23Reply