stevertr

Updated Jan 18

Oakley Plaintiff. Matte blk /polished. Blk frame

Name: Oakley Plaintiff. Matte blk /polished. Blk frame
Brand: Oakley
SKU: 6005c5bd275e551b4fe6fc9e
Price: 85.0 USD
Availability: InStock

NWT

Oakley

$85 $150

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $21.25 with . Learn More .

Size

Like and save for later

Add To Bundle

Oakley Plaintiff. Matte blk /polished. Blk frame only Brand new

Category

Color

Shipping/Discount

$7.97 Expedited (1-3 day) Shipping on all orders

abharkl and 12 others like this

13 Comments

stevertr @jdowden89 meet me here. I’ll ship tomorrow

Nov 15Reply

atozeenicky Steve I kind of want to sell you those shades even if it's not the price I wanted

Dec 04Reply

atozeenicky interested in taking both pairs of Oakley's off my hands for 275 total?

Dec 04Reply

stevertr @atozeenicky how about 250. And we have a deal

Dec 04Reply

atozeenicky Steve c'mon brother ..squeezing my pockets

Dec 04Reply

stevertr @atozeenicky I will need lenses. And rubbers for both frames. The rubbers on the Juliet’s from what I can see need to be replaced I’m happy to save both a few dollars if you want me to send the $$ direct

Dec 04Reply

atozeenicky nah no need for that I respect the posh hustle, they deserve their cut for something. it's just less than they're both worth ya know ...in the hands of the right collector who can get all that they're easily 500 dollar glasses

Dec 04Reply

atozeenicky you could sell it with a coin for a grand all day ..you've got the missing links to put all those other listing/auctions to shame

Dec 04Reply

stevertr @atozeenicky what’s the condition of the lenses of both. The rubbers don’t seem to be in good shape. That’s why I have to estimate my costs to get them back to original shape S

Dec 04Reply

atozeenicky the lenses on both are in good enough shape to sell or use..to be exceptional you might have to replace the Juliet lens but I think the others are in excellent condition for what they are. I mean they're 15 years old, but they def don't look it

Dec 04Reply