vicki_oneil

Updated Aug 20

Omega vintage gold watch with movements replaced

Name: Omega vintage gold watch with movements replaced
Brand: Omega
SKU: 669ab101fe7e2c08a82afac1
Price: 175.0 USD
Availability: OutOfStock

Omega

$175

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $43.75 with . Learn More .

Size

This item is sold

Like and save for later

Omega Watch 1950’s Has been serviced. 1 owner 14k Gold Filled G62321 Serial number is also marked

Category

Men

Accessories

Watches

Shipping/Discount

Seller Discount: 10% off 2+ Bundle
$7.97 Expedited (1-3 day) Shipping on all orders

capone_22 and 9 others like this

14 Comments

mannyfresca69 Can you take back off send me pick

Jul 19Reply

vicki_oneil @mannyfresca69 I will update the images with the back open by noon Saturday

Jul 19Reply

patrickroth Wow this watch is incredible! Would you be interested in a trade for anything out of my closet? :)

Jul 21Reply

vicki_oneil @patrickroth thank you for that offer. I’m downsizing and not purchasing anything at the moment.

Jul 21Reply

patrickroth @vicki_oneil can you post a picture of the movement inside the watch? Is it an automatic or hand wound?

Aug 01Reply

vicki_oneil @patrickroth certainly I’ll update It is automatic.

Aug 02Reply

vicki_oneil @patrickroth updated photos

Aug 02Reply

patrickroth @vicki_oneil you do know that the movement in this watch is a quartz movement and not a automatic movement… I hate to tell you but I think this watch isn’t authentic

Aug 02Reply

vicki_oneil @patrickroth interesting. It was my father’s and I don’t ever remember it being fixed or repaired. I’ll be sure to look into it.

Aug 03Reply

patrickroth @vicki_oneil the movement in this watch is a Japanese quarts movement probably produced in the 2000s so if it’s a real watch case then ur movement is a replacement and it is sad bc I LOVE vintage omegas lol

Aug 03Reply

vicki_oneil @patrickroth yes, that’s what it seems. And I’m pretty sad that someone did this to this gem of a watch.

Aug 03Reply

vicki_oneil @patrickroth thank you for your help. I would never want to post anything incorrect.

Aug 03Reply