meganspriest

Updated Jan 29

Roberto Cavalli Variscite RC500S sunglasses

Name: Roberto Cavalli Variscite RC500S sunglasses
Brand: Roberto Cavalli
SKU: 575b0d3d620ff79027000cb0
Price: 45.0 USD
Availability: OutOfStock

Roberto Cavalli

$45 $430

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $11.25 with . Learn More .

Size

This item is sold

Like and save for later

Roberto Cavalli 'Variscite 500S' sunglasses in palladium black. Oversized butterfly frames that work well with any face shape. Crystal ornamentation on the sides in Cavalli's signature logo. Metal frames with chrome accents. Minor scratches on lenses and wear on frames; noticeable blemish on the right lens as shown in third picture. In used condition.

Category

Color

Shipping/Discount

Seller Discount: 20% off 2+ Bundle
$8.27 Expedited (1-3 day) Shipping on all orders

samirajan08 and 17 others like this

12 Comments

missblondie33 Still available?

Jan 18Reply

meganspriest @missblondie33 yes!

Jan 19Reply

missblondie33 Would you take 100?

Jan 19Reply

missblondie33 Does it come with the case?

Jan 19Reply

meganspriest @missblondie33 hi @missblondie33 it does come with the original case! Please feel free to make me an offer, I'm always willing to negotiate!

Jan 20Reply

missblondie33 Would you be able to hold these until Sun possibly? I definitely want to purchase them!!

Jan 20Reply

meganspriest @missblondie33 hi @missblondie33 just let me know when you're ready. They're held for you!

Jan 22Reply

missblondie33 Thank you, it's going to be tomorrow if that's ok.

Jan 22Reply

develle5 Hi what is the condition of these? Any scratches on the lenses? Any type of damages ?

Jan 27Reply

meganspriest @develle5 There's a blemish on the right lens as shown in the last picture. Other than that, they're in excellent condition.

Jan 30Reply

develle5 @meganspriest hi when you say blemish on the lens...what does that mean? A scratch?

Aug 13Reply

meganspriest @develle5 if you look at the third pic you can see the blemish on the right lens. It's not a scratch, it seems like there was a defect in the gradient.

Aug 14Reply