twood10

Updated Dec 09

Rose Gold Marc Jacobs Watch

Name: Rose Gold Marc Jacobs Watch
Brand: Marc Jacobs
SKU: 56e0486dbf6df5128203cb6d
Price: 30.0 USD
Availability: InStock

Marc Jacobs

$30 $225

Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $7.50 with . Learn More .

Size

Like and save for later

Add To Bundle

Used authentic Marc Jacobs rose gold watch. The battery is dead, so it would need another battery.

Category

Women

Accessories

Watches

Shipping/Discount

Seller Discount: 10% off 2+ Bundle
Price Dropped: 40%
$7.97 Expedited (1-3 day) Shipping on all orders

lilydelaware and 78 others like this

23 Comments

kapkivos Authentic ?

Apr 20Reply

twood10 @kapkivos yes

Apr 20Reply

kapkivos Any defects ?

Apr 20Reply

twood10 @kapkivos no. It's only been worn a few times so it has slight wear. The battery is dead though. So it would need a new battery.

Apr 20Reply

kapkivos More pictures ?

Apr 22Reply

meghoffpauir Could you maybe upload a closer picture of its face?

Apr 26Reply

twood10 @meghoffpauir sure.

Apr 26Reply

orangewood would you consider 80

May 02Reply

twood10 @orangewood yes

May 06Reply

nicoldoutside Do you have all of the original links?

Aug 20Reply

twood10 @nicoldoutside yes I do!

Aug 23Reply

orangewood Would you consider 75

Sep 18Reply

twood10 @orangewood yes

Sep 19Reply

littlenguyen Do you have merc

Dec 27Reply

twood10 @littlenguyen yes I do my name is stellaraye

Dec 27Reply

neverforget123 Is this still available?

Jan 20Reply

twood10 @neverforget123 yes

Jan 20Reply

pritzi trade?

Feb 25Reply

twood10 @pritzi sorry. Not interested in trading.

Feb 27Reply

al125 Hi! The second picture looks like there are some strange marks on the wrist clasp part of the watch. Are there really markings there or is it just the picture? On a scale of 1-10 what would you honestly say the condition of this watch is?? (other then the fact that it needs a new battery..I’m okay with that!)

Sep 12Reply

twood10 @al125 I’ve only worn the watch a few times. I would say the condition is an 8 honestly. I think it photographed weird. I’m not sure

Oct 30Reply